Will the Feds Hold Interest Rates Steady?

Here’s the current consensus around U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate expectations — are markets expecting the Fed to hold rates steady or cut them? The answer is both in different time frames, and the context matters a lot:

🔹 Short-term outlook (next Fed meeting)

  • The Fed is widely expected to hold interest rates steady at the upcoming January 2026 meeting, with no cut announced right now. (Investopedia)
  • Fed officials are signaling they want to keep policy focused on data, not politics, and aren’t likely to cut this week. (AP News)
  • Wall Street commentary also suggests policymakers are more cautious than aggressive on rate moves right now. (Morningstar)

Bottom line: Hold expected at current levels (often cited around 3.5–3.75% as of the latest cycle). (Trading Economics)


🔸 Medium-term view (through 2026)

Here, opinions diverge:

Markets still price in potential cuts later in 2026

  • Some economic projections (dot plots) have shown markets expecting one or two quarter-point cuts later this year as inflation cools. (Trading Economics)
  • A nonpartisan U.S. budget office report also projects a lower final rate by year-end 2026. (The Telegraph)

⚠️ But many economists now think cuts may not happen until later or not at all

  • Recent surveys of economists show most think the Fed will hold through at least the first quarter and possibly longer due to inflation still above the 2% target and continued moderate economic growth. (Investing.com)
  • Some major bank forecasts (e.g., JPMorgan) have shifted to expecting no rate cuts in 2026 and even a potential hike later if growth and jobs stay strong. (Reddit)

Why this divergence?

  • Inflation: still above the Fed’s 2% target in many measures.
  • Labor market: remains relatively tight in parts of the data.
  • Economic growth: decent enough that the Fed may not need to cut quickly.

📊 So what’s the practical expectation?

Here’s a simplified market consensus snapshot:

Time frameExpected Fed action
Next policy meeting (Jan 2026)Hold steady
1Q–2Q 2026Still likely hold; cuts not widely expected yet
Late 2026Some markets price possible cuts, but economists are mixed

🧠 Key drivers shaping expectations

No cut likely right now because:

  • Inflation remains elevated vs target.
  • Fed officials emphasize data dependency.
  • Economic resilience (especially jobs) reduces urgency for easing. (CBS News)

Cuts could still happen later if:

  • Inflation falls closer to target.
  • Growth slows meaningfully.
  • Labor market weakens.

🔎 What markets are currently pricing

Financial markets (via futures and yield curves) still reflect some probability of cuts by mid-late 2026 — but those odds have been pulled back recently as strong data and official comments push the expected timing later. (Trading Economics)


📌 Bottom line

Right now: The Fed is expected to hold rates steady at the next meeting.
Looking forward through 2026: There’s no strong consensus yet — market pricing suggests possible cuts later in the year, but many economists now think cuts may be delayed or may not come if inflation and growth stay firm.

Implications if EU Liquidates US Treasuries

With Trump pushing the U.S. to acquire Greenland, this could seriously damages trans-Atlantic relations. If the EU responds by liquidating (or even signaling liquidation of) U.S. Treasuries, here’s what that would actually imply — economically, financially, and strategically.


🧭 First, context check (important)

Greenland is tied to Denmark (EU/NATO).
So this isn’t just a bilateral spat — it’s interpreted as:

  • U.S. pressure on European sovereignty
  • A test of alliance trust
  • A reminder that Treasuries can be political leverage

That framing is what markets would react to.


🧨 Immediate market implications (if EU action is credible)

📉 1. U.S. Treasuries: yields spike

  • EU institutions are large, price-insensitive holders
  • Even threats of liquidation would:
    • Push 10Y–30Y yields higher
    • Steepen the yield curve
  • Auction demand weakens → higher term premium

📌 Translation:
Higher borrowing costs for:

  • Mortgages
  • Corporations
  • U.S. deficits (this is the big one)

💱 2. USD: short-term up, medium-term down

Short-term:

  • Risk shock → USD reflexively rises

Medium-term:

  • Reserve diversification narrative accelerates
  • EUR, CHF, gold benefit
  • USD loses “unquestioned reserve” premium

📌 Markets would read this as:

“Treasuries are no longer politically neutral.”

That’s huge.


📉 3. U.S. equities: bearish, volatility spikes

  • Rising yields = valuation compression
  • Tech & growth hit hardest
  • Financials don’t necessarily benefit — disorderly yield moves hurt balance sheets

VIX goes up. Liquidity thins.


🪙 Safe havens & alternatives

🥇 Gold: strongly bullish

This is gold’s dream setup:

  • Geopolitical fracture
  • Weaponization of finance
  • Questioning sovereign debt safety
  • Reserve rebalancing by central banks

Gold wouldn’t just rise — it would reprice structurally higher.


🥈 Silver

  • Short-term: volatile (risk-off)
  • Medium-term: follows gold higher
  • Gold/Silver ratio initially spikes, then compresses

🌍 Systemic / strategic implications (this is the real story)

⚠️ 4. Alliance fracture premium

Markets would start pricing:

  • Political risk inside NATO
  • Less coordination on sanctions, defense, trade
  • Higher long-term uncertainty premiums

This is not priced into markets today.


🏦 5. Fed backstop becomes unavoidable

If EU selling is material:

  • The Fed would implicitly have to absorb supply
  • Balance sheet credibility comes into question
  • Fiscal dominance fears rise

📌 That’s inflationary over time, even if growth slows.


🌐 6. Accelerated financial bloc formation

This would push:

  • EU → greater euro-centric reserve strategy
  • More bilateral trade settlement outside USD
  • Faster movement toward regional financial systems

Not the end of dollar dominance — but the beginning of erosion, which markets hate.


📊 Asset impact summary

AssetImpact
Treasuries↓ Prices, ↑ Yields
USDShort ↑ / Medium ↓
U.S. equities↓ (growth worst)
EU assetsRelative ↑
Gold↑↑↑
SilverVolatile → ↑
VIX
Credit spreadsWiden

🧠 What markets would really focus on

Not Greenland itself — but:

  • Is this symbolic or strategic?
  • Is the EU acting coordinated?
  • Do others (Japan, Gulf states) quietly follow?
  • Does the U.S. respond financially or politically?

If answers trend the wrong way → systemic repricing.


🔑 Bottom line

If Greenland rhetoric escalates into EU Treasury liquidation:

  • This is not a normal geopolitical headline
  • It challenges the assumption that U.S. debt is untouchable
  • Gold becomes the clearest winner
  • U.S. financial conditions tighten fast
  • Markets price a more fragmented world

It wouldn’t cause a crash overnight —
but it would permanently raise the risk premium on U.S. assets.

Probability of Another Rate Cut and Market Outlook

Here’s a breakdown of the likelihood of another Federal Reserve rate cut and what that could mean for markets:


✅ Probability of Another Rate Cut

  • Market-based tools (like the CME Group FedWatch Tool) show ≈ 90%+ probability of a 25-basis-point cut at the next meeting (late October 2025).
  • Futures markets are also pricing in ~70–80 basis points of total cuts in 2025 after the already-announced September cut.
  • While a cut is very likely, there’s uncertainty about magnitude and timing beyond the next meeting; the Fed emphasizes it’s not on a “preset path.”

📊 Market Outlook Given Another Rate Cut

What the market is likely to do

  • Stocks: Growth stocks (especially tech and long-duration names) and rate-sensitive sectors (housing, REITs) may rally as borrowing costs decrease and future earnings look more valuable.
  • Bonds: Short-term yields should fall as the policy rate is cut; long-term yields may fall too if growth/ inflation fears dominate, which means bond prices rise.
  • U.S. Dollar: Likely to weaken somewhat — lower short-term interest rates reduce foreign-investor demand for USD-denominated assets.
  • Gold & safe assets: Could benefit as real yields (nominal yields minus inflation) drop, enhancing the appeal of non-yielding but inflation/allocation assets.
  • Commodities: May get a boost, especially if the cut is seen as pre-emptive and supports growth; but if the cut signals deepening economic weakness, commodities may falter.

Potential caveats & risks

  • If the cut is seen as a signal of economic weakness (rather than confidence) — e.g., labor market weak, growth faltering — then markets may start to worry about earnings declines and recession risk, which could offset the initial positive reaction.
  • If inflation remains sticky, the Fed may highlight caution about further cuts; growth/tech may lag if rate cuts appear insufficient to stimulate.
  • The magnitude of reaction may depend on communication: how the Fed frames forward guidance matters as much as the cut itself.